post #9 argument and counter argument
Argument
My goal is to understand what are the consequences that commuting might cause to a student's life and compare it to the life of those who live on campus. Many students begin college with much enthusiasm are discouraged to continue by many different factors which ultimately can lead them to drop out. As a commuter myself, I know how very annoying, time consuming, and tiring it can be to commute for an hour to campus. Not only having to leave enough time to get to school but also, time to park, time to make snacks if I am staying for a long period of time, as well as other things such as gas and toll. A commuters social life is affected as well, events are something that can not usually be attended being that aside from school, individuals have work, or have to leave in order to get home faster and try to avoid traffic, however, events can also be a distraction for many students. Research shows “One possible explanation for why students living in residence halls do not perform better academically than students living off campus postulates that residence halls are primarily social settings in which students encounter more opportunities for social rather than academic involvement ” (Pascarella et al., 1994; Schroeder & Mable, 1994). Being able to commute to school can offer more focus to the student because they are attending school only for class, use the library when necessary, or to study for midterms/ finals.
Counter argument
Commuting can be a convenience but seems to mostly affect the social life of individuals.
“Research has documented that students living on campus are more likely than those living off campus to interact with faculty, participate in extracurricular activities, and use institutional resources” (Astin, 1984; Chickering, 1971, 1974; Pascarella, 1984; Pascarella et al., 1994; Welty, 1976). “Living on campus in a residence hall, then, is an important environmental factor associated with increased student involvement, which in turn is a determinant of improved critical thinking ability, intellectual growth, persistence to graduation and satisfaction with college” (Gellin, 2003; Pascarella, Bohr, Nora, Zusman, & Inman, 1993; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991; Pike, 1991; Tinto, 1987; Velez, 1985).
Those who do not embrace the opportunities presented in their new campus residences and instead remain strongly linked to high school social networks often report feeling relatively “out of touch” and more dissatisfied with their college experiences (Christie & Dinham, 1991). GPA is not a factor that has significant increase but students seem to be affected socially being that they are not able to be on campus since they lack free time. They also have to be make time and are available at a certain time slot which makes it harder to interact with teachers and students. This can however be contradictory since it is dependent on the individual person and if they are involved with campus life or want to be a part of it as compared to only going to complete their studies and getting a degree.
Comments
Post a Comment